For The Love Of Mumford

Learning about love, forgiveness

By Jessica Mast


Buying the 2009 Mumford and Sons album Sigh No More was an incredibly foolish decision. It was an impulsebuy in the intoxicating halls of Amoeba Music, a purchase based on small snippets of these British folks rock songs I had just vaguely heard. It was a fantastic decision.

My experience of romantic love has not been altogether perfect. It seems this is a common burden, hoping for people to love us perfectly and then coming to the harsh realization that they are merely people. (Go figure.)

 Turning on the radio, one finds romance everywhere—confessions of head-over-heels infatuation, frustration and sorrow at love gone wrong, blame toward that two-timin’ woman or that man who can’t be trusted. But from Mumford, I heard something entirely different that took me by surprise: an apology.

But it was not your fault but mine
And it was your heart on the line
I really f*ed it up this time
Didn’t I, my dear?


This raw confession comes from Little Lion Man, with the popular edited version never quite capturing the intensity of what it means to blunder so badly. For whatever the reason, these men singing are passionately apologetic, recognizing the damage caused and begging for forgiveness. In the album’s title song, there is an equally passionate and mournful cry of the simple, “I’m sorry.”

I wish I could hear the people who’ve hurt my heart sing out these lyrics, cursing and all. God knows the times I need to sing them out as well, cursing and all. There is something about owning the pain, crying out in repentance and hope for reconciliation that restores my faith in that reconciliation. It reminds me to forgive, even when nobody may come serenading me with the words of Mumford.

Mumford has pushed me to forgive those I thought I might never forgive. And Mumford has given me hope that others can forgive me when I do not deserve it in the least. This is redemption in action.

What sustains my hope for redemption is this vision of love that Mumford offers, a vision of love that is nothing short of the beautiful kingdom of God.

Love, it will not betray you
Dismay or enslave you, it will set you free
Be more like the man you were made to be
There is a design, an alignment
A cry of my heart to see
The beauty of love as it was made to be


In the same breath in which the men of Mumford take ownership of humanity’s shortcomings, they proclaim a love boundless and fulfilling—the love we were meant to encounter in relationship with God. They call us to pursue this love, as they sing, “Awake my soul, for you were made to meet your maker.”

What motivates me to forgive is not assurance that humanity will drastically change, that the love I receive from people will somehow become perfect, that romance will suddenly turn easy. What motivates me to forgive is knowing that there is something bigger and better than human romance in store. From the album’s closing track After the Storm, the music of Mumford articulates a hope that I cannot resist, a hope that echoes this kingdom we seek.

But there will come a time, you’ll see
With no more tears
And love will not break your heart
But dismiss your fears
Get over your hill and see what you find there
With grace in your heart and flowers in your hair

Mumford reminds me that this love—the love that will not break my heart—is real, and is worth hoping for.

Jessica Mast, Fresno, Calif., works with the youth at Mennonite Community Church, loves her inner-city neighborhood and is always excited about good music. She has also attended Fresno Pacific Biblical Seminary. Mast shares thoughts on the journey of spirituality at jessicaleighmast.wordpress.com.


25 comments (Add your own)

1. Tim Neufeld wrote:
Great reflection! What Jessica does so well is show that all art can reflect the beauty of the Creator. Thanks to CL for including this.

Wed, February 1, 2012 @ 10:57 AM

2. Aaron Bryan wrote:
A profound reflection on a profoundly moving album. Thank you, Jessica, for sharing and a standing ovation to Christian Leader for publishing this! I'm proud to be an MB!

Wed, February 1, 2012 @ 1:50 PM

3. jason ekk wrote:
Great post Jessica! It is great to acknowledge that music and art do not have to be happy all the time to speak truth. Truth is messy. Love is difficult. Mumford and Sons show this beautifully.

That song (Little Lion Man) reminds me of the many psalms where David is conflicted with his own sin and crying out for forgiveness. Anyways... great stuff.

Wed, February 1, 2012 @ 2:04 PM

4. Marissa Nunes wrote:
You are incredible. :)

Thu, February 2, 2012 @ 10:04 AM

5. Sheri Balakian wrote:
In scripture, God manages to convey to us everything we need to know about forgiveness, reconciliation and redemption and never needs to use a single cuss word. Unfortunately, using an asterisk does not prevent our brains from filling in the blank. I can not see how fowl language can bring glory to God in any way. I am very disappointed and upset with the Christian Leader for choosing to print this article and by it's inclusion in the magazine, endorse the use of such language. I also have to wonder why it takes an offensive song to teach about a subject that the Bible is so eloquent and thorough on.

Wed, February 8, 2012 @ 1:15 AM

6. Sheri Balakian wrote:
Jessica,In my comments above, I don't want to sound like the fact that you are hurting and searching doesn't matter. I am sorry for the pain that you have been through, but I think you are looking for answers and comfort in all the wrong places. Music is a gift from God and can be very good, but not all music is good - not all music reflects the beauty of the creator. Because we live in a fallen world, much of the music, art and literature are not good at all. Reading men like Henri Nouwen can be a dangerous thing, also. Henri Nouwen was a Catholic who came to the conclusion that all paths lead to God. In his book "Sabbatical Journey" he wrote - "Today I personally believe that while Jesus came to open the door to God's house, all human beings can walk through that door, whether they know about Jesus or not. Today I see it as my call to help every person claim his or her own way to God." Jesus said "...I am the way, the truth and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6. Spend your time in the Word of God, and not in man's flawed views. When we repent and come to the Lord, he will forgive our sins and comfort us. And if God can forgive a wretch like me, surely He can help me to forgive others.

Wed, February 8, 2012 @ 11:22 AM

7. Dennis Fast wrote:
Jessica is an excellent writer and I applaud her style of writing and the insights she gained from the music of Mumford and Sons. I have friends who really like that song as well. towever, I agree with Sheri Balakian in my disappointment that the CL staff chose to include the unnecessary and inappropriate language in the song. I hope there will be more discernment in the future. I'm wondering if Tim Neufeld meant "all kinds of art" or acutally "all" art. Some are is disgusting and vulgar. I'm sure God can redeem it but how does that reflect the "beauty" of the Creator. Am I missing something in point of view?

Thu, February 9, 2012 @ 7:14 PM

8. Richard Kunz wrote:
Excellent article, Jessica! While it is true that the words used in the song may be offensive to some, they are just words and affect each of us differently. Our language is constantly changing, as is the culture around us. For many, the word in question is simply used to express strong emotion, and really carries none of the vulgar connotation we associate it with. This song, then, may not reach out to all, because there will be those too put off by the use of that word, but that does not mean that there are not a lot of people who will agree with Jessica's interpretation. I do not think God is so limited that he cannot reach people through things that some might find offensive.

Also, on a related note, I do not know if the members of Mumford and Sons are themselves Christian, but I do think it is incredible how God can use Christians and nonchristians alike to bring glory to His name. There are so many great chorales, hymns, cantatas, masses, and paintings (many created specifically for the church) that speak powerfully about God and yet were composed/performed/created by those who are not Christian.

Fri, February 10, 2012 @ 7:29 PM

9. Elliot Cavale wrote:
Really cool article Jessica! I love that whole album. So so good. I love how we can find glimpses of truth anywhere.

I might have to disagree with Sheri. I believe a cuss word (derived from 'curse' word) should only be labeled as such if it is aimed at a person in an effort to inflict verbal/emotional harm on someone. Marcus Johnston had zero intention of that when writing this song. In my opinion, it is quite possible that is just about the only word in the English language that can sum up the feeling he was trying to convey. It is only English-speaking culture that made the F-word a stigma in some circles.

The following is an excerpt from a Relevant magazine article that I think did a good job of painting a picture of Johnston's intentions:

"But what about when Mumford & Sons say something about f---ing up? A moment of accountability and admittance, coming from the very heart of conviction. Except they confess it using profanity one song and then later making, perhaps, their most profound statement of praise:

'In these bodies we will live, in these bodies we will die/ Where you invest your love, you invest your life/ Awake, my soul. You were made to meet your maker.'

I’m not saying we bring profanity into the church, or that we all express our frustrations with faith using swear words. Rather, we can take a look at how a moment such as this can be so deeply rooted in a relationship with Christ. And isn’t that how our relationship with God works sometimes? One second we feel the need to curse, to shout out in frustration and confusion and plea for insight or answers, and the next second we praise, or maybe we glimpse a moment of understanding and truth. And yet, most of the songs we sing—out of the hymn book or the WOW worship mix—don’t address a lot of the feelings we inevitably come across in our relationship with God." (http://www.relevantmagazine.com/god/worship/features/22374-when-the-secular-is-sacred)

Sat, February 11, 2012 @ 4:54 AM

10. Pam Ascanio wrote:
I too, am sorry for Jessica's painful experiences. However, looking back over my life, it's in those situations that I've grown the most because I know where to turn for healing, redemption, and forgiveness. Those qualities are divine, in their purest form, and can only be found in the presence of my Savior, Jesus. I found the article troubling because Jessica thinks she has found those things in Mumford. Why is her hope in him and not Christ alone? Jessica says, " What sustains my hope for redemption is this vision of love that Mumford offers.." Mumford didn't die for you, Jessica. Your hope needs to be in the one that holds your tomorrows.

Sun, February 12, 2012 @ 11:22 PM

11. Carolyn Warkentine wrote:
I agree with Sheri Balakian and Pam Ascanio. Thank you, Sheri and Pam, for pointing people to Jesus Christ alone and keeping a biblical worldview.

Wed, February 15, 2012 @ 10:51 PM

12. Chris Brownell wrote:
Jessica, thanks for the article. Spot on the money.

Regarding the whole conversation about the use of a particular word in a particular magazine, I think this is much much ado about absolutely nothing. If people were to look at the history of the word you would find that it is considered vulgar because it was used by "lower class" individuals from a people that the cleaned up, snooty, better than them Pharisees er Christians of the day held in disgust, like carpenters from Nazareth. It and most "cuss word" have been demonized strictly for their association with certain people not because a Holy edict from a God who knows no sin said they were evil.

Oh why do I go down this road?

I am reminded of one of my earliest introductions to Christianity in a time where I wondered about Jesus, and the church. When I heard Tony Campolo run through a litany of the worlds ills most of which could be lessened, ended or were directly caused by human decision. These included horrendous numbers of young children starving, old women dying alone and forgotten, nuclear weapons proliferating at insane rates, etc. etc. As he raised the crowd to the point of atrocity overload...he says,"And most of you couldn't give a SHIT!" pauses pauses Then he says, "And most of you care more that I just used that word here in a church like setting than you do about any one of the atrocities I just mentioned." The incongruity of the moment was palpable. The wind went out of the room. Both of these words come from a group of people who used them to indicate sexual intercourse or feces in their common everyday language but it was the fact that they used them that made the words dirty, not the words themselves.

Jessica your writing is superb. Your sentiments are real, and reflective of so many. And I thank you for writing this article, I have not spent much time listening to M&S but know my daughters enjoy them, and you have given me new insight into why the would and should. For that I am grateful, God bless you and keep you.

Thu, February 16, 2012 @ 6:15 PM

13. Rick Bartlett wrote:
Thanks for sharing your story Jessica and thanks CL editor for posting authentic stories.

Thu, February 16, 2012 @ 6:51 PM

14. Amy Stone wrote:
Simply beautiful! Thank you for ministering to my heart. Your words ring true to the gospel of reconciliation. I am pleased by your presence in the church and look forward to seeing more great leadership from you. Good work, Sister!

Thu, February 16, 2012 @ 6:55 PM

15. Kurt Willems wrote:
First, I want to say that I affirm this article in all its content! As Christians, we are invited to be in the real world and to interact with culture. It seems that Jesus was known for this pattern. Hey, he even went to parties and supplied the wine. This got him labeled a "drunk and glutton." Jesus understood that religious taboos don't define what is appropriate as we interact with culture, the power of the Spirit and the love of God do. Jessica... Amazing!

I want to comment to Sheri Balakian, Pam Asconio, Pastor Dennis, and Carolyn Warkentine. While I understand where you are coming from (and deeply respect your love for Jesus Christ), it seems to me that you run the risk of allowing what you believe to be "true" to dictate your approach to this issue, rather than honest biblical engagement. What I see happening in you taking offense is the very thing you try to avoid: culture defining what is right.

The key difference here is that you kind folks seem to have allowed "Christian culture" to define this for you.

I grew up in a context where Paul’s words were oft quoted: “Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths…” I wonder what determines unwholesome speech? Does the popular culture? Does the FCC? Nope. The answer comes in the second part of the statement: “…only that which is good for building others up ACCORDING TO THEIR NEEDS.” This statement both relativizes cussing and invites contextualization. The test, does using this word tear someone down or build up? If it doesn’t tear them down (because it is part of a language they understand) then we ought not live in a legalism that the Scriptures don’t impose.

Oddly enough, in Philippians (3.8) Paul says that he considers all things as “rubbish” or “garbage” or “dung” or “loss” compared to the greatness of knowing Jesus. This Greek word (skubalon) is only used once in the New Testament. And yes my friends, that word is a first century cuss word. The New International Dictionary on NT Theology states:

"Skubalon – In secular Greek this depressing word means rubbish and muck of many kinds: excrement, rotten food, bits left at a meal as not worth eating, a rotting corpse. Nastiness and decay are the constant elements of its meaning; it is a coarse, ugly, violent word implying worthlessness, uselessness, and repulsiveness... The only NT usage is Paul’s in Phil 3:8, where he says of all the natural and religious privileges which once seemed sweet and precious, and all the things he has lost since becoming a Christian, 'I count (estimate, evaluate) them as (nothing but) dung.' The coarse and violent word shows how completely Paul had ceased to value them." [New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology Vol. 1, Zondervan: 1980, pg 480]

Again... Clearly Paul was willing to use a dramatic word to describe a spiritual reality. He had moved from "rubbish" or worse, to redemption and no other word accurately described this than a first century cuss word.

I do not think that we ought to be known as “cussers” but I do believe there’s something wrong when my non-Christian friends feel the need to apologize when they slip the F*Bomb in the conversation. My response is always: "Please, please, please feel free to be exactly who you are around me! Your language doesn’t offend me or make me see you in a bad light. I’d rather get to know the real you." I want to deal with authentic people, not people that think something as small as cursing determines the character of a person.

So... while I understand the concerns of some of the commenters in this post, I think that they are misplaced and might be driven by subjective feelings about certain words and not by the raw reality of biblical authors, inspired by the Holy Spirit, conveyed the beautiful and messy realities of the Kingdom of God. Also, if we believe in a God who redeems culture and uses it for God, we ought to be glad when we see the truths of Christ reflected in unlikely places!

Thu, February 16, 2012 @ 7:12 PM

16. Brad Burkholder wrote:
I connected with your article, Jessica. Thanks for being real.

Thu, February 16, 2012 @ 10:12 PM

17. Megan Zupancic wrote:
The human face of Jesus is often hidden. We are often ashamed to reveal that the love of our God is so great that God BECAME human to love us, to love us humanly.

Let us never stop remembering the beauty of our savior, who took on human emotion to reach us.

Thank you Jessica :)

Fri, February 17, 2012 @ 10:25 AM

18. Dwayne Trott wrote:
As one who spent twenty years in the Navy, I know how pervasive vulgarity can be. It is a cancer that infects our language and our thoughts. What you set your mind on becomes you. I have known men and women who could not end a sentence without punctuating them with vulgarity. They didn't start that way, it just grows in you. As an eighth grade teacher, I also see how coarse our students are getting in their thoughts and language. I really hate to see it spread into the church, or worse, being defended by Christians as being "real". I have worked very hard to keep such language and thoughts out of my life. It isn't easy. It is all around us. I don't believe that the words have power in themselves. I think they give us the false idea that somehow "naughty" words express ideas better. Or perhaps, we are "with it" because we can talk just like everyone else. I don't agree and want to have language that is honest, edifying, and yet accurately expresses my thoughts and feelings. By the way, you don't have to be Christian to believe these words are too coarse for public use. The reason these artists use these words is to show they are beyond the reach of modern culture. I believe we do not help our Christian witness by sounding like them. I've had my crises in life, but I choose to look for appropriate ways to express my anger, sorrow, pain, or suffering without being profane.

Mon, February 20, 2012 @ 3:31 PM

19. Jason Kinzel wrote:
Thanks Jessica. Your article hit home.

Wed, February 22, 2012 @ 12:44 AM

20. Brad Bowman wrote:
Thank you Jessica for your authenticity in revealing one of the experiences that has drawn you closer to the heart of Christ!

I am saddened that there has been negative reaction to your article, and I have to question the motives of those reactions. I can’t help but laugh as I imagine a sign posted outside of a church (where all people should be welcome) that reads “no profanity allowed.” And if we post one sign then don’t we have to post another explaining what the profane words are? So maybe we post a second sign that lists words not to be used in church, which would be quite ironic; but isn’t that what is really taking place here?

Where does it stop?

Who determines what the bad words are? Do they have a committee? Who is the committee chairperson? Who appointed the committee chairperson? How do we know if the committee members are qualified? Do they know more bad words than most other people do? Does the pastor use bad words? Does the pastor know bad words? Does knowing bad words keep you out of the church? If so does hearing bad words keep you out? (Because I hear a lot bad words from people around me every day) If so then I’m… (insert bad word here… preferably a verb… pass tense)

What is going on here?

It is a shame that some people will read this article and not remember anything else except for an asterisk. Some will have missed seeing the heart of a young woman that was drawn closer to Christ because they choose to focus on the asterisk. I hope those in the “asterisk group” have never seen a PG-13 movie; or of they have, I hope they walked out… and threw their stones at the screen on the way, because that is exactly what is happening here.

I hope there is room in Paradise for those who use bad words. And I sure hope there is room for people who have somehow been inspired to draw closer to Christ by those that use them too.

In a world that lacks forgiveness, how can we, as Christians, not celebrate when people forgive each other?

In a world that needs reconciliation, how can we, as Mennonite Brethren, not celebrate when peace and reconciliation have been restored?

In a world that needs Christ’s love, how can we not celebrate drawing closer to His heart?

In a world that lacks compassion, how can we not celebrate when love and compassion have been extended?

What if the love and compassion does not come from a Christian?

What happens when non-Christians act more like Christ than Christians themselves?

I believe that Christ can be glorified through all things; otherwise how can the Creator of all things allow cancer to exist, or allow innocent people to be raped, tortured and murdered? What kind of God lets that happen? I believe that only a God that is big enough to somehow be glorified, regardless of circumstance, could allow such terrible events to take place. And if He can be glorified through an innocent man beaten, tortured and murdered on a Roman cross, then He can certainly be glorified by a young woman that was inspired to forgive because she heard a song with a “bad word” in it.

Neither the author nor the editor of this article should have to offer up any sort of apology coerced by leadership that is too weak to support an authentic portrayal of Christ’s love and forgiveness. What is next for The Christian Leader, flannel-graph inserts? Because it is hard to be offended by the authenticity level of flannel-graph Jesus.

Thanks again Jessica, and may all our hearts be inspired to draw closer to Christ through any source.

Wed, February 22, 2012 @ 2:46 PM

21. Ed Boschman wrote:
Thanks to all for weighing in with your thoughtful responses and personal opinions. I'm deeply grateful that there are so many among us who feel and think and care deeply.

The places in the interchange at which I would like to offer some caution are at the points of questioning motive, and what is being called weakness. It would be a privilege for me to have a personal chat with anyone about those matters. Please call me anytime if you would like.

Our CL is a magazine which is intended to be for the purposes of building up,and unifying, and strengthening the individual and collective witness for kingdom impact of all our individual members and our entire national family. That includes the full spectrum of life, from children to those more chronologically gifted. It behooves us to be sensitive to all the cultures and age groups into whose hands the magazine lands. When a part of our family is offended, the appropriate Christlike action for us is to make it right.

My personal communication with Jessica has been both clarifying and an encouragement to her. I affirm her giftedness, her graciousness, and her passion as an authentic follower of Jesus and effective witness to her faith.

May the Spirit of Jesus continue to be honored among us as we each receive and share his grace with one another.

Fri, February 24, 2012 @ 12:59 PM

22. Melody Unruh wrote:
My comments here are not directed toward Jessica but rather toward the motivations of the folks who chose to publish this article to begin with. This article appears to me to be what is commonly known as a "trial balloon". Just as Tony Campolo (referred to in comment #12) hurled his BIG WORD for effect, so too this, in my opinion, was done to see how we would all react. If it turns out to be a tempest in a teapot with only a handful of people responding, we should expect to see more of the same in the future.

Sun, February 26, 2012 @ 3:46 PM

23. dfygchyog wrote:
AqwRGN , [url=http://wmqyopxeozzi.com/]wmqyopxeozzi[/url], [link=http://jolampewlmld.com/]jolampewlmld[/link], http://uyebfvcmoass.com/

Tue, March 13, 2012 @ 4:49 PM

24. anyldfcz wrote:
o2Sn2Y , [url=http://eufnmecyzzwj.com/]eufnmecyzzwj[/url], [link=http://usczarucamlk.com/]usczarucamlk[/link], http://mckrpoafjzhy.com/

Tue, March 13, 2012 @ 5:23 PM

25. hhztjwbyr wrote:
UdXUmS , [url=http://iklvohhyvbaw.com/]iklvohhyvbaw[/url], [link=http://yrlqzjcbkpri.com/]yrlqzjcbkpri[/link], http://eqijmoareykq.com/

Wed, March 14, 2012 @ 4:25 AM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.