The People Behind The Statistics

Retired surgeon reflects on current health care debate

 

by Roger Fast

As a medical consultant for the Social Security disability program, every day I review the records of 15 to 20 people who are applying for disability benefits, to determine if they are credible from a medical point of view.

 

A couple of months ago I reviewed the case of a 40-plus-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis. She was working and had health insurance, but she stopped the medication that controlled her arthritis because she could no longer afford her co-pay. The cheaper alternatives didn’t work well, and soon her hands were too deformed to work. She lost her job and with it her insurance, and then couldn’t afford even basic medication.

With health care reform in the news, I decided to track for one month how many such situations are in my caseload. I read the records of a 24-year-old woman who had a childhood kidney transplant. Her job did not provide health insurance benefits, and she could not get her own health insurance because of her pre-existing kidney problem. She could not afford the medications needed to prevent transplant rejection, and three years after stopping the medications her kidney failed, and she went on dialysis.

I read the story of a 40-year-old nurse who at 18 was treated for bone cancer with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation and was cured of the cancer without amputation. He tripped at work, broke the femur that had had the cancer and needed emergency surgery. Both the workers compensation insurance and the group health insurance refused to pay for or authorize the needed therapy to help the slow-healing bone to mend. He could no longer work as a nurse and with no job he couldn’t get insurance. He was left with a poorly treated injury, a huge debt, no job and no insurance.

Based on my survey, I see on average five cases per week like the ones I describe. Knowing there are about 100 other medical consultants in my state with similar caseloads, you can do the math. When I read a statistic like 47 million Americans are uninsured, it does not have the same impact as the stories of real people that I read in my work every day. Radio and TV speakers opposed to health insurance reform in the U.S. vilify these people, calling them “dirty hippies,” “lazy,” “aliens” and other epithets. And this to me is the ultimate insult—to vilify someone who has been victimized by a health care system that doesn’t work for them.

I do not believe that government should be the agent of any one religion, even though all religions advocate caring for the poor and sick in our land. But as individuals, we certainly should act and vote in accord with our religious values.

I am grateful for the biblical training I received from my parents and my church. It is implicit in the mission of our denomination that we bring healing to the sick and good news to the poor. I am shaped by what I have learned about Jesus and his teachings. Caring for the sick and the poor are major themes of Jesus’ ministry (Matt. 25:31-46, Matt. 11:2-6, and Luke 6:20). There is no question in my mind about Jesus’ attitude toward the people who are left out of our health care system. Surely he would not vilify them.

In the end, the decision on health care reform should be made on the basis of how we—religious or not—want our government to serve us. There are many areas where we think the government should be less involved and should let private enterprise and the free market system work. There are other obvious areas where we want the government to run the enterprise and where the private sector would lead to instability, such as national security. I think this is becoming true in health care.

Until now, our government has protected the right of private health insurance companies to leave out people who are not profitable at the expense of the poor and the unlucky. Accidents and illness can attack anyone. Just as we have a government military and policing system to provide security for all the people of our country, we should have a government-insured health care system that protects all of our citizens against such attacks. It may be against the grain of capitalist ideals, but it would be consistent with the ideals Jesus taught.

Roger Fast, a member of College Community Church in Clovis, Calif., is a retired general surgeon who served as a medical missionary to the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the 1980s.

3 comments (Add your own)

1. Melanie Carlson wrote:
These case scenarios do not surprise me in the least. I am the wife and mother of a family whose every member has a diagnosis of mental illness. We have no insurance, I have been out of work for almost two years, and now we are in the position of having to apply for disability for my husband and son. We can't apply for our other son because the school district refuses to evaluate him for special assistance (based on his good grades), and without the evaluation, we cannot apply for his disability coverage.

We cannot afford basic medication, let alone our psychiatric medications because we can barely afford to pay our rent and car payment. The prospect of nationwide health care provided me with a glimmer of hope--until I found out the proposed bill fines (and/or jails) those without coverage (to the tune of several thousand dollars. If I could afford the fine, my family would have their medication on a regular basis.

If people who profess to be Christians truly had the desire to care for the sick and needy, I can't help but think there would be a lot less sickness and poverty in this country. My observation is that people tend to stick to the platforms of their political party (whether or not they truly understand the issue at hand), and if they are comfortable and well, they don't want to do anything to jeopardize that comfort--even it means helping others. I wonder why I've been playing David Bowie's "I'm Afraid of Americans" so much lately....

Wed, November 18, 2009 @ 12:04 PM

2. Mike Groft wrote:
Questions:
1. If some parts are malfunctioning on a vehicle, or electronic devise, or... do we completely get rid the it or do we attempt to fix it?
2. Has there ever been a government program that has been efficiently run, without huge overruns, or costing astronomically more than the original estimate.
3. Who pays for the behemothic national debt that will only get bigger, which cheapens the dollar's value that buys the necessary research to find the cures for debilitating diseases, that pays the salaries of health care workers, that sends relief of all kinds, including medical, to the myriad of countries around the globe? Our children and grandchildren?
4. Will churches be constrained by law (in the proposed national health bills) to not help alleviate the sufferings of people around us, or give aid to only government specified groups?
5. Is the capitalism that has raised and given more money in history to needy groups the enemy, or something else?
6. Do all that claim the name of Christ 'vilify' those in need, even of insurance?
7. Did Jesus deal with 'all' people or individuals?

Thu, November 19, 2009 @ 11:00 PM

3. Roger Fast wrote:
I am sure that Mike Groft speaks for the majority of Christian Leader readers in opposing health insurance reform, since polls show that 70% of white evangelicals do. I would only suggest that of all developed countries in Europe and North America, the only ones besides the US that allow people to suffer without insurance are Mexico and Turkey, and Mexico did pass a law in 2003 which will hopefully cover all its citizens with basic insurance. In the US, those with Medicare are by and large very satisfied and glad to have it. Regarding the national debt, if reform is unsuccessful in reining in health care costs, at least our children and grandchildren will get a benefit from it (health insurance) which they don't get from the war and other contributors to our national debt. In Matthew 25:31, Jesus says that when the Son of Man takes His throne, He will gather "the nations" and judge them according to how they took care of the marginalized in society, including the sick and the poor. I don't think the defense of "But we were good capitalists!" will stand up in that day.

Tue, November 24, 2009 @ 9:51 PM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.