The Trouble With Blogs

How should MBBS respond to anonymous attacks?

MB Biblical Seminary faces a dilemma. A variety of blogs have recently popped up on the Internet critical of many evangelical seminaries, with a few choosing to focus specifically on MBBS. A blog, like a newspaper column, offers an opinion. Unlike a newspaper column, a blog can be anonymous. The blogs that are attacking MBBS and Mennonite Brethren conference leaders have no names attached. The blogs give the appearance of being placed by people who have taken classes at MBBS-Fresno, though this is uncertain.

How should a Christian institution confront such mischief? As indicated above, MBBS is not alone in facing this question. At the Willow Creek Leadership Summit in August 2008 Bill Hybels made repeated reference to the pain at Willow Creek, the congregation he pastors, over blog attacks. MBBS too has puzzled over the right response.

Our first response was to chuckle in amusement. The bloggers are clever but harmless, we thought. Then we learned that someone had sent the bloggers’ URL address to many U.S. MB pastors—just ahead of the July national convention. When asked about the blogs, we tried to answer questions directly. Despite these bloggers’ claims to the contrary, we are committed to the MB Confession of Faith and seek to teach the Bible faithfully. Questions continue to swirl.

We’ve hesitated to give the bloggers the satisfaction of a direct response. We wonder: Does a response dignify their methods? Does a response create the impression that there might be some credence to their charges? And what about those who know nothing about the blogs? Will a response now create doubts about the reliability of MBBS? Will the old adage that “where there is smoke, there must be fire” be used to create suspicion about MBBS?

How do you deal with anonymous attacks on your character or against your friend? I appreciate the e-mail I got from an old friend yesterday with the subject line, “Praying for you.” He says in part, “My heart has been praying for you a lot this morning. Yesterday (someone) raised concern over MBBS that stems from the blog that has been circulating. Blogs are often . . . the passion of someone who has not checked carefully the information he is using to draw his conclusions. I am committed to doing my best to influence (them) to respond biblically. You have been a friend for a long time. I will protect that relationship. MBBS is my school and I will do my best to stop the slander that wants to take root.”

The Internet is a tool that can be used for good or ill. While online communities can provide personal support, e-mail can also be a tool for evil. It can be tempting to forward a message without checking its validity. The Bible warns against false accusers. Ghost bloggers are part of a shadow community that may fan the fires of gossip.

For us at MBBS, the bottom line is that anonymous blogging fails to measure up to the biblical injunction to “speak the truth in love” (Eph. 4:15). The blogger controls the blog space. Attempts to enter a reasoned conversation can be met with contempt and false charges. Christian communication works in the light. Christ-like dialogue is candid but respectful.

Our aim at MBBS is to help pastors prepare for the contemporary world. We do this by helping them anticipate some of the tough questions they may face. Pastors need to be able to help other believers respond appropriately to the divisive issues that are raised in the “marketplace of ideas.” At MBBS we think this means being aware of the various points of view—not just presenting “right answers” that will stop debates.

MBBS welcomes open discussion about the controversies of our time. We have invited the U.S. and Canadian Conference Boards of Faith and Life to converse with us—even examine us. We would be pleased to have direct interaction with you, our supporters, to discuss any questions. An article addressing the theological issues raised by our critics is posted online.

I’ve shared openly with you about our dilemma. I welcome any opportunity to speak personally with you about these issues. We may not agree about every biblical interpretation, but as believers seeking to be faithful to the Bible and its interpretation in the MB Confession of Faith, we will be able to grow through meaningful and direct communication. I welcome your calls, e-mails and visits. Above all, I ask you to pray for MB Biblical Seminary. Please ask God that we will continue to be faithful to our mission of inspiring and equipping men and women to live as disciples of Jesus Christ and to serve and lead in the church and in the world.

Lynn Jost, acting MB Biblical Seminary president, can be reached at 559-452-1791 or ljost@mbseminary.edu.

6 comments (Add your own)

1. Bonnie Klaassen wrote:
As a blogger, I would like to respond to this article. My blog may or may not be one of those referred to.

One of the reasons I created my blog, at www.fortheauthor.blogspot.com (just over a year ago) is that I wanted to have a record of the things I was seeing in “Christendom” in general, and the MB Conference in particular, because I have deep Mennonite roots. (A broader statement of the purpose for my blog can be found on my website.) The other reason is that I wanted to have a voice in the Christian community. The MB Herald provides a space for this voice in its letters section, but only 200-300 words are allowed. This simply is not enough space to say what I want to say. I highly doubt if the Herald would welcome me as a contributing author as I am rather an unknown in the MB circles and in the literary world. I also believe that my voice would be considered unwelcome there because I am speaking out about things I see which are construed to be controversial in nature. My voice is one calling out for discernment in a day and age where false doctrine and false teachers abound. It seems there are many who are willing to sacrifice truth on the altar of unity.

Regarding anonymity, I originally chose to remain anonymous for several reasons. The primary one is that of personal privacy, because I am a woman online which makes me vulnerable to those who may wish to harm me. It is also for the protection of my husband and children. My message on my blog is evangelical in nature and one that espouses the exclusivity of the gospel message, a message which could be construed as hate in a world where truth is relative, and proselytizing an act of hatred. Those who claim to be tolerant will not tolerate those who claim the Jesus is God in the flesh and the only way to a restored relationship with God by His substitutionary and efficacious death on the cross. Some of the evangelistic blog postings and links that are found on my blog could be reason for those who espouse “political correctness” to have my blog removed from the blogosphere, which would also mean that my witness would also be lost to those who find my blog while searching for the truth. I could be legally charged for “inciting hatred” according to those who think this way. (There has already been once case where that has happened.) I have an email address on my blog by which people can contact me. This way it is at my discretion to decide whether this person is an honest enquirer or a malicious person wishing to cause me trouble. At one time, not long ago, I did reveal my last name, and it was in regard to an article for which I knew it was vitally important to be accountable. Since reading the above article, I have decided that I would take the risk and leave my full name permanently on my blog. It may lead to persecution, and I need to be willing to face it if I want to speak the truth. So be it. If anonymity is the problem to those in the MB Conference, I willingly place my full name on my blog.

I really have nothing to hide. On my blog, I state that I am capable of error and open to correction. That doesn’t mean I won’t defend the truth when I think it is being undermined. I am not going to roll over and play dead just because somebody doesn’t like what I have to say. I would hope that any person who may read and/or comment on my blog would also be open to correction; however, I will not engage in arguments with people who already have their mind made up, being convinced that I am wrong, and also that I am being malicious and hateful. Anybody who really knows me knows that I am not that kind of person.

I have spent a full two years researching two of the main topics of my blog, the spiritual formation movement and the emergent church, both of which are gaining a foothold in the MB Conference. My blog is the fruit of that research. I really wish that what I know about these things were not true. It would sure make my life a lot less complicated. For a long time I tried to convince myself that I was wrong about these things, but I have come to the conclusion that I can no longer deny the conclusions I have come to. The purpose for my blogging is not to be malicious or slanderous. Some people think what I am saying is an “attack”, but if that is the case, what is being said in the above article is also an attack on bloggers. And now that you know my name you can even “attack” me personally if you like. Anyone who is willing to take the time to carefully examine my blog will soon see that I have a deep love for both the Living Word and the written Word.

Very rarely do I post anything on my blog without first giving it very serious thought and careful research into the matter, especially if it is something serious in nature. It seems many would like to forget the warnings in Scripture that we are to give attendance to doctrine, to watch out for false teachers and false teaching, even to the point of naming names and warning others to stay away from such. Jude especially wrote with a sense of urgency to warn believers about such things. Are we to neglect doing this? I fear that this is what is happening. By the tone of the above article, it seems that its author believes that the MB institutions are incapable of teaching error, and do not want to deal with the possibility that some of their leaders could be in error. We must be careful not to idolize people and institutions. We are to follow Christ and Christ alone. I’m happy that the Board of Faith and Life affirms their adherence to their statement of faith. I wonder, however, what action they would take if they found out someone is teaching error, whether they care to admit it or not. I think those in leadership are too quick to accept people just because they have a few initials behind their name. I seriously have begun to wonder whether they carefully examine the teachings of those in leadership or not. And I think they have forgotten just how devious Satan is. Most people do not want to talk to me face to face about the issues I tackle. They are afraid that it might upset their applecart. Some are even completely ignorant about the issues I am tackling. My blog is a place where I am free to express my opinion to the full extent, and where people who are afraid to tackle certain topics in a face-to-face encounter can ask questions and find information. I think that Christian bloggers have an important place in this world. It is not difficult to discern what a blogger’s intent is with a careful examination of all of the contents of their site. Don’t be so quick to judge a blogger’s intent as malicious just because they don’t agree with everything you say and do. As always, I encourage people to examine what I have to say carefully, and to use Scripture as their guide and measuring stick. God’s Word is always to be our final authority in all matters of faith and life. I want people to check out what I have written, to judge for themselves whether it is true or not. I do not claim to be the last word on anything. I am not trying to mislead people, and I tell them not to take what I say as gospel truth, although I love the truth and want it to be known. I want people to diligently seek the truth, not just take my word for it, or anybody else's for that matter, whether they be in leadership or not. People are not perfect, but those who have a sincere love the truth know when something rings true and will vigorously defend it, especially if they love God’s Word and are knowledgeable about it. We must examine our hearts, whether we love the truth more than we love the praise of man. The human heart is deceitful and desperately wicked, and our minds in need of transformation. We must allow the light of God’s Word to shine on our hearts and minds, to discern our thoughts and the intents of our hearts.

As both a blogger, a Mennonite, and a Christian, by sticking my neck out and challenging people by what I write, I actually stand to lose a lot. I was a fifth generation member of my local MB church (a member for 35 years). Two of my children are sixth generation members there. My family has very strong ties to the MB denomination and to the people in our local church in particular. We are related to most of them in fact. However, I chose to withdraw my membership from this church this April because it is an MB church. It was one of the most difficult decisions I have ever made. I did not do this without a lot of very serious thought. It was a heart-wrenching experience; it did not give me any pleasure to do so. I still love this little church and still attend there. I refuse to run away from any who wish to question what I have done. I have been open and upfront in my handling of the matter. I have been under the scrutiny of our church ever since by those who still do not understand my reasons for doing so, partly because they don’t want to know the reasons for fear of the consequences. They risk the loss of family support and fellow-member’s understanding and the ensuing alienation, the same risk that I took by doing what I did. I would have preferred actually not to have withdrawn my membership, but was compelled to do so by some of the things being taught through some of the MB publications and educational institutes. Please understand this: it has given me no pleasure to do so, and it gives me no pleasure to write what I write about on my blog. I am compelled to speak out to defend the truth and to warn my fellow-believers about what I see happening because I love them and am concerned for their spiritual well-being. My blog is both my personal testimony and my voice, and I refuse to keep silent. It is a permanent record of what God is doing in my life. The things that are happening with the Spiritual Formation movement and the emerging church are promoting a form of godliness that is without the power to transform lives in a positive and biblical way. I stand behind that statement 100%, and have the personal experience to prove it.

So, what to do about us “bloggers”? If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear. If everything the seminary is teaching and the MB Conference is promoting is biblical, once again, you have nothing to fear. I, for one, only desire to have the truth be known. If you have the same goal, you have nothing to fear. I have basically put everything on the line by speaking out. I may suffer some dire consequences by being upfront with you in this comment I am writing. I may come under attack. I may even be charged with libel (although I don’t think I have said nothing libelous). A lot of people may not like me, they may even be told to stay away from me. Judge this matter for yourself. Do I speak the truth on my blog or not? If I do, once again, you have nothing to fear, unless of course you fear man rather than God. But then you seriously need to examine yourself, to see if you are in the faith.

For the record, I have never attended any Bible School or Seminary within the MB Conference. I do however have one year of Bible School at a non-denominational school and have taken several seminary courses at a non-denominational seminary, one of them being Spiritual Formation. I have never made any claims to the contrary.

Jesus, if I have said anything here that brings you shame or is a blot on the garment of your Bride, the church, I pray that you will reveal it to me by your Spirit, and correct me as soon as possible. It is my desire to be an open book before you and my fellow-believers.

Purchased by His blood and kept by His grace,
~Bonnie Klaassen

Tue, December 16, 2008 @ 1:41 AM

2. Bonnie Klaassen wrote:
Oh, and by the way, I am one of those who have been praying for those in positions of leadership within the MB Conference and at MBBS for several years already, and I will continue to do so, as you are asking for prayer.

So whether you consider me an enemy, a mischief-maker (as stated in the article) or just a plain nuisance, I AM a fellow-believer in Christ and a fellow-Mennonite, one who is willing to sound a voice of warning when it is unpopular to do so. Before you make a judgment about me and what I say, I will ask you to carefully check out everything I have to say for yourself. I do not believe it is my job to convince anybody about anything one way or another. That is the job of the Holy Spirit. It is only my job to speak out about what I see. What I ask is that you be willing to examine the issues carefully from both sides as I have, and then make your own decision, being led by the Holy Spirit and open to His correction where necessary.

I have never intentionally misrepresented any educational institute. I take what I do as a blogger very seriously and provide as much documentation as possible. If I have ever said anything that could be construed as libelous, I would appreciate you letting me know, as that is not my intent. I am not interested in getting involved in any legal suits with any Christian brethren. There have been times when I have even asked others to proof-read my work to make sure that I was not doing or saying anything out of a malicious spirit, or that was immoral or illegal. If there has ever been a doubt in my mind as to whether I should post an article or not, it remained as a draft only until I was sure about what I had written, and had prayed about the matter. These are safeguards I have put in place, and yet I know I am still fully capable of error. Although I am speaking out, I hope you will see that it is with discretion.

I am just one small voice in a vast sea of Mennonites. I have come to see things differently than most and I am not like most people you know. I am not the least bit concerned with other people's opinion about me, although I don't set out to deliberately offend others. I have a deep-seated reverential fear of God. I read and study all day long most days even though I am not in a formal educational institute. Although I have taken classes in a seminary, I have concluded that the best textbook is the Bible and the best teacher the Holy Spirit; that God's Word alone contains everything we need to know about life and godliness. I take offense to those who uphold the words of a "Bible scholar" above the words of the Bible itself. I am only 45 years old, and yet I am not interested in the latest and greatest craze regarding personal spiritual growth or church growth. I am interested in the knowledge God has provided in His Word about such things. I still think the proclamation of truth and the personal testimony of believers are the most powerful tools for growth that exist, and I believe these are the tools God gives us for church growth. You cannot improve on God's Word or His methods; and, we don't need to make God's Word relevant: It IS relevant, period! So many have come to the conclusion that we need to adopt the world's ways of doing things to win the world, but God calls us OUT of the world, to be separate, to make a difference between what is profane and holy.

Let it be known that I am a firm believer that those who are concerned for their character care not a whit for their reputation. Those who think they have anything to fear by me are more concerned about appearances than character, more concerned about money than about truth.

I challenge those in leadership to carefully examine their teachings before God and His Word, and continue to allow themselves to be conformed to His image. Christ's last message to the churches called for repentance. I urge you all, dear brothers and sisters, in light of His imminent return, to carefully examine yourselves in all things. May God bless you as you respond to Him with humility and obedience. I also ask for your prayers for me, that God will continue His work in and through me as I walk the narrow way. I am "looking unto Jesus the AUTHOR and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God the Father."

I am "For the Author",
~Bonnie Klaassen

Tue, December 16, 2008 @ 6:45 PM

3. Betty Kasper wrote:
I am not as eloquent as Bonnie but I do have some things in common with her. One is my MB heritage which I have cherished since I was a child. Above this however I have cherished my Bible and what it says to me. It was with great sadness that I noticed that the MB chruch I was attending at the time was introducing "new" "ways to "spirituality" into our church that I could not find in my Bible. I got to see first hand some of the fruits it bore. We had just moved to a new town and I comforted myuself with the thought that this was an isolated case. As I learned more about this from my MB Herald and looked into churches in other places it became obvious to me that while the specifics might vary a bit the trend was more general. Even visiting my beloved MB church in which I grew up there was evidence of a change that I found disturbing.

Again like Bonnie this has caused me great pain. I have been going through a period of mourning that has included leaving the MB church in my area and looking for a new church home. I would much rather not have had to do this but felt I had no choice since I could not find any MB churches in my area that were not espousing spiritual formation among other things. An additional sadness for me has been that I have had to go to a non-mennonite church to find a church that centres it's teaching on Jesus. By this I mean the messages and music that we were having hardly mention Jesus at all.
This is not about only the MB church. It is occuring in many churches who call themselves Evangelical.
Most so called Evangelical churches we have visited are focussing on things like hearing from God or being close to God, or some other topic which is good in itself but not the central theme of the Bible. No matter how good these things are without Christ our faith is vain. There is nothing wrong with wanting to be close to God. The bible states Jesus came to bring us to God. If I forget who Jesus is and that His death for me is central to my faith the kind of closeness I will experience with God will suffer. This is very subtle and it took me a while to put a finger on what was wrong. I was leaving church feeling sad and hunrgy for spiritual food.It occurred to me first from our worship music. We sang a lot of songs that say something along the line of, Lord I want to worship you. Nothing wrong with worshipping Jesus and God, but then it occurred to me that Lord is generic and anyone could come in and worship with us and think of Budda or Allah or insert any name they choose into the lyrics and be happy with it. Then I counted how often we mention the name of Jesus in our services and the number was quite low. One good thing that came from this was that it forced me to "search the scriptures" Like Jesus advised the pharisees to do. This led me to a renewed joy and awe of what really is mine in Christ. It also left me sad that so many are missing these riches because we are forgetting to mention them more often.
None of us would think of having a seminar on hockey for eaxample and then not refer to hockey since it is the core of the seminar, yet we seem to find it OK to have a service focussed on something like love or service or worship and forget to mention who is the one who IS love. I know I may not be popular for wanting more mention of Jesus and his death for us either and have also struggled with how best to approach all of this. It reminds me of a poem my mother had (and yes she was a loyal member of the MB church from the time of her conversion until she died at age 97.) It was about Noah, and part of it went "Noah built the ark alone the people died in fashion". How close we are to being in the days of Noah will depend on how many of us read our Bibles more and what people say less. Jesus did say "as it was in the days of Noah so also shall the coming of the Son of Man be". It would be a sad day indeed if the MB church were to die in fashion and not be in the proverbial ark at all.

Another sadly disenfranchised MB who still cares. Betty

Tue, December 16, 2008 @ 8:47 PM

4. Lyndon Unger wrote:
Interesting response. Would not it be prudent to take heed to some old words:

"Leave these men alone! Let them go! For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail. But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God." - Acts 5:38-39

Before the internet, the world was full of crazies and rationally malfunctioning fruit-cakes who had had no public forum for publicly displaying their insanity short of a local comic book store or bus stop. You could let them tell you about whatever and then let them be; it was plain to everyone that they were not really a threat to anyone.

But before the internet, there were also a few people who were actually dangerous. People like Jan Huss, John Wycliffe, Martin Luther, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Spurgeon, BB Warfield, Cornelius Van Til, etc. We remember them as reformers; men who stood up for the truth of the scripture in the face of a seemingly unending tsunami of non-biblical teaching and practice. If one of those saints were around today, would they have a blog?

Would they blog anonymously?

I can definitely imagine that they would, given the right circumstances. Though I'm not a MBBS student or grad, I have been in situations where I either critiqued error anonymously or be kicked out of school or my church.

When I went to Bible College and Seminary, I learned all my history, theology, Hebrew and Greek, and so on. From the time I started to the time I left, there were some massive theological shifts that happened. Many students noticed them besides me, and we voiced complaints in the class. We were sidelined and told to stop being "mischief makers", "Taliban Terrorists" and "Termites in the cross". We were warned to stop questioning the theological shifts of the school. So, we offered to submit concerns in writing, and then we asked if we could give presentations in classes to present the "other side of the issue". We were told simply to shut up and brushed off with alarmingly bizarre dismissals (One faculty member told us that the school rejects inerrancy because “inerrantists believe in a flat earth”…?!?). We were roasted behind closed doors and threatened, so we decided to utilize the internet for addressing issues. We didn't advertise anything, nor tell anyone where we were posting our biblical convictions, and we did it anonymously so as to not get kicked out of school or start some personality cult. We simply wanted to spread the truth of the word of God in love; love for God and his word and his people who were being mislead, not ‘love’ (tolerance and acceptance) for false teaching. Only a few people found our information, but it lead to conversation on campus and some critical evaluation about what was going on. ‘Some’ was arguably better than ‘none’.

Years later, I was helping out at an MB church and came to realize that the church was teaching some non-biblical doctrine about charismatic issues, evolution and egalitarianism. I took several months to check things out and do my research, finding that the scripture was being handled tritely or simply ignored. Several people would respond to all questions with a paper written by some MB on the issue, saying “this is what I think”, with all questions being addressed to “read the paper”. I attempted to converse privately with several pastors and elders. I wrote several papers and documented my concerns, giving thorough biblical response to what I perceived as issues. I attempted to do so privately and with as much humility as I knew how. The official line from the leadership was "There is room for disagreement on these issues and we do not agree with you". Unofficially, I was told over lunch by one pastor that though he essentially didn't follow my exegesis of some of the scriptures and respected me as an biblical scholar, he really didn't have the time to consider the issue. Another pastor informed me that he had never heard my position articulated but had instead believed a very false caricature for some time, and therefore had to take time to evaluate what I had said. After several months he said he thought I had a ‘biblically sounding’ position on the issue, but had not found the time to search the scriptures to test what I had said. Ultimately, I was told that if I was to continue teaching, it would be best if I didn’t mention anything on those issues. I agreed and never mentioned those issues at church, in any teaching that I did.

Instead, I started blogging anonymously. I wrote several posts on the issues and opened up conversation with individuals who found my blog but didn’t know who I was. The knew what they heard in Sunday School didn't sound right, but couldn't exactly work through why what they heard didn't sound biblical. I wanted to see God’s word lifted up, but I also didn’t want to start a personality cult or slander anyone at the church.

So, I sympathize with the people who comment critically of MBBS. They’re likely afraid of getting kicked out of the seminary, and they’re likely afraid for their families. Like it or not, that happens all the time and is a reasonable concern.

I am also deeply concerned with the theological trends in the Canadian MB conference, and the penchant for Canadian MB’s to hide old heresies behind academic rhetoric, sophistry, and selective application of scripture without respect for context or content.

If these problematic bloggers say things that are obviously wrong or hateful, that will be apparent to any discerning readers. If what they say has merit, then the truth is a difficult thing to stop.

Sun, December 21, 2008 @ 9:19 AM

5. Lyndon Unger wrote:
I just re-read the post and couldn't help but notice:

"For us at MBBS, the bottom line is that anonymous blogging fails to measure up to the biblical injunction to “speak the truth in love” (Eph. 4:15). The blogger controls the blog space. Attempts to enter a reasoned conversation can be met with contempt and false charges. Christian communication works in the light. Christ-like dialogue is candid but respectful."

Could not the same accusation be waged against those who are in control of, or instructing at, schools? Are not the administration in charge of the schools and able to decided what is discussed and what is ignored? What happens when attempts to enter a reasoned conversation in the seminary classroom is met with contempt and false charges?

I remember how once, in seminary, I had to write an evaluation on one of the textbooks. I had concerns with the book, and it was shameless propaganda for a theological position that I found unbiblical. I wrote about what I liked in the book and what I disliked, giving equal space to both and providing references for all points. My professor gave me 2/20 on the assignment, telling me that he gave me a mark of 10% on the assignment (which was 10% of my grade) because he thought I wrote it in an 'critical spirit'. I asked him if I did the assignment, which he agreed I did. I asked him if I provided reasoning for my position, which he agreed that I did. But, since he had the power and the position, he failed me horribly because he didn't like what I had to say even though he agreed that I fully did what he asked of me in the assignment.

That was on a paper that nobody read but the professor. Do you imagine that professor seemed open to discussing that issue in the classroom; do you think he seemed interested in reasoned conversation? Do you think that I felt that there was an atmosphere that was open reasoned conversation in that class? What if, for a moment, something like that were to be the case in the classes of even one professor at MBBS?

If the tables were turned and the anonymous bloggers were the professors and the professors were the ones with theological concerns who were afraid of being academically or personally cudgeled for their positions, I wonder whether the professors would ever be tempted to blog anonymously?

Wed, December 24, 2008 @ 9:24 PM

6. Jim Sarco wrote:
Lyndon Unger blogs at mennoknight.wordpress.com which, when you are reading it, is like stepping on a piece of poo!

Good night and good luck!

Thu, April 11, 2013 @ 1:25 AM

Add a New Comment

Enter the code you see below:
code
 

Comment Guidelines: No HTML is allowed. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Thanks.